Re: Train Simulator 2013 - RW4
Inviato: 11/09/2012, 14:13
"Just having a look at all the 3rd party Payware creators alone, both in the UK and America, are any of them young and of the Facebook tribal age who RSC aspire to, NO, they are, in the majority, mature adults. If RSC think that hundreds of 14 and 15 year olds are going to jump out of the woodwork on their Facebook page and build top quality content, to replace these train enthusiasts who've been a bain in the lives of RSC for months on end, that is considered worthy to RSC standard to sell as DLC, next month, or, next year, then they're living on another planet. To run a successful business, RSC need folks with railway/railroad passion, and IT knowledge, tool and editing experience within the Railworks editor to develop and build locomotives, routes, rolling stock, scenery, etc, etc, etc. Kids don't have this, they're thick, half of them can't read, or, write, some of 'em don't even know what a train is, never mind an NDA.......lol "
http://www.trainsim.com/vbts/showthread ... ost1770169
Se togli chi è appassionato, sà disegnare, sà usare un computer e lasci il tutto in mano ad una massa d'incompetenti... non finisce bene.
Ops.. è la stessa cosa che stà succedendo in questo momento in politica, scienze, economia, ...gestione delle ferrovie..., etc, etc, etc, etc....
"I have no feeling of loyalty towards RSC (Really Stupid Company). As far as i am concerned too many half truths and broken promises have been made."
I post di rgarber sono fantastici perchè e a contatto diretto con gli RSC... e non fà il supporter fanatico di professione.
"Was this intended for me? If yes, four years ago takes us back to 2008. The fact is the scenarios worked better then than they do now. At least for my Colton & Northern route I could create some pseudo scenarios that were a facsimile of what we did with MSTS. In 2011 the whole thing got worse and that's when they started dampening the AI's ability to where now it's almost impossible (i.e. without hours and hours of testing) to create a decent scenario and that's if it works. Can you imagine my own embarrassment? I have two Fort Kent videos on my site showing you can direct multi-traffic on a single track main that used to be able to be done. I can't replicate any of it now. But get this, those scenarios still work for the Fort Kent. *sigh* Makes no sense, there must be some kind of date stamping going on that tells the AI when to use the older AI or something...."
"Would also have been fun, but again they "fixed" the problem by disabling the feature. They did a lot of that. "
Molto interessante. Stanno instupidendo la già non troppo intelligente AI.
Proprio la direzione giusta verso cui andare....
http://www.trainsim.com/vbts/showthread ... ost1770169
Se togli chi è appassionato, sà disegnare, sà usare un computer e lasci il tutto in mano ad una massa d'incompetenti... non finisce bene.
Ops.. è la stessa cosa che stà succedendo in questo momento in politica, scienze, economia, ...gestione delle ferrovie..., etc, etc, etc, etc....
"I have no feeling of loyalty towards RSC (Really Stupid Company). As far as i am concerned too many half truths and broken promises have been made."
I post di rgarber sono fantastici perchè e a contatto diretto con gli RSC... e non fà il supporter fanatico di professione.
"Was this intended for me? If yes, four years ago takes us back to 2008. The fact is the scenarios worked better then than they do now. At least for my Colton & Northern route I could create some pseudo scenarios that were a facsimile of what we did with MSTS. In 2011 the whole thing got worse and that's when they started dampening the AI's ability to where now it's almost impossible (i.e. without hours and hours of testing) to create a decent scenario and that's if it works. Can you imagine my own embarrassment? I have two Fort Kent videos on my site showing you can direct multi-traffic on a single track main that used to be able to be done. I can't replicate any of it now. But get this, those scenarios still work for the Fort Kent. *sigh* Makes no sense, there must be some kind of date stamping going on that tells the AI when to use the older AI or something...."
"Would also have been fun, but again they "fixed" the problem by disabling the feature. They did a lot of that. "
Molto interessante. Stanno instupidendo la già non troppo intelligente AI.
Proprio la direzione giusta verso cui andare....